News for the ‘uncategorized’ Category

Don’t call me, I’ll call you…

So, your government’s being a big meanie, pro­tect­ing their out­dated nobil­ity and dic­tat­ing what you may or may not call your spawn, with, sur­prise, sur­prise, badly con­struc­ted legislation.

Sweden

This is the quandry that Swedish cit­izens find them­selves in, with ref­er­ence to the Nam­ing Law [1982].

The part of the law ref­er­en­cing first names reads: “First names shall not be approved if they can cause offense or can be sup­posed to cause dis­com­fort for the one using it, or names which for some obvi­ous reason are not suit­able as a first name.” If you later change your name, you must keep at least one of the names that you were ori­gin­ally given, and you can only change your name once.

Now you might think it ridicu­lous that such legis­la­tion would be neces­sary in the first place, but on a rock, home to such pres­ti­gi­ous awards as The Dar­win Awards, you need to remem­ber that we’re cater­ing to the low­est com­mon denom­in­ator here.

Being an act­iv­ist is a respect­able pur­suit. It’s pro­gress­ive, con­struct­ive and healthy, but nam­ing a per­son after a cause, is fraught with stu­pid­ity, a lack of foresight and plain ol’ sad­ism. Ima­gine Obama as Lenin, Mother Theresa as Helen of Troy or Kony as Ein­stein. A per­son shall be what a per­son shall be. Per­son­al­it­ies aside, expect­ing your kid, labelled through a druggy fog, to make it through dec­ades of life as Sponge­bob, Nutella or MacGuyver is a hein­ous sen­tence for crimes yet committed.

Per­haps the most unique name tendered to the Swedish selec­tion com­mit­tee for approval was “Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116”. No sh*t.

To make things even more com­plic­ated, yet sim­pler at the same time, that ^ is pro­nounced “Albin”. I’m sure you knew that already though.

Unsur­pris­ingly, it was rejec­ted. The par­ents, ever an example of genius, later sub­mit­ted “A” (also pro­nounced Albin) as the child’s name. It, too, was rejected.

If Angelina were to fol­low suit, she might be able fill the alpha­bet with her brood.

So, who has else has enacted daft nam­ing laws. Reph­rased, who has else has proven to need such daft nam­ing laws?

Ger­many

In Ger­many, you must be able to tell the gender of the child by the first name, and the name chosen must not be neg­at­ively affect the well being of the child. Also, you can not use last names or the names of objects or products as first names. Whether or not your chosen name will be accep­ted is up to the office of vital stat­ist­ics, the Standes­amt, in the area in which the child was born. If the office rejects your pro­posed baby name, you may appeal the decision. But if you lose, you’ll have to think of a dif­fer­ent name. Each time you sub­mit a name you pay a fee, so it can get costly. When eval­u­at­ing names, the Standes­amt refers to a book which trans­lates to “the inter­na­tional manual of the first names,” and they also con­sult for­eign embassies for assist­ance with non-German names. Because of the hassle par­ents have to go through to name their chil­dren, many opt for tra­di­tional names such as Max­imilian, Alex­an­der, Marie, and Sophie.

Japan

In Japan, one given name and one sur­name are chosen for babies, except for the imper­ial fam­ily, who only receive given names. Except for a few examples, it is obvi­ous which are the given names and which are the sur­names, regard­less of in what order the names have been given. There are a couple thou­sand “name kanji” and “com­monly used char­ac­ters” for use in nam­ing babies, and only these offi­cial kanji may be used in babies’ given names. The pur­pose of this is to make sure that all names can be eas­ily read and writ­ten by the Japan­ese. The Japan­ese also restrict names that might be deemed inappropriate.

Den­mark

Denmark’s very strict Law on Per­sonal Names is in place to pro­tect chil­dren from hav­ing odd names that suit their par­ents’ fancy. To do this, par­ents can choose from a list of only 7,000 pre-approved names, some for girls, some for boys. If you want to name your child some­thing that isn’t on the list, you have to get spe­cial per­mis­sion from your local church, and the name is then reviewed by gov­ern­mental offi­cials. Cre­at­ive spellings of more com­mon names are often rejec­ted. The law states that girls and boys must have names that indic­ate their gender, you can’t use a last name as a first name, and unusual names may be rejec­ted. Of the approx­im­ately 1,100 names that are reviewed each year, 15–20% of the names are rejec­ted. There are also laws in place to pro­tect rare Dan­ish last names.

Ice­land

The Ice­land Nam­ing Com­mit­tee, formed in 1991, is the group that decides whether a new given name will be accept­able. If par­ents want to name their child some­thing that is not included on the National Register of Per­sons, they can apply for approval and pay a fee. A name has to pass a few tests to be approved. It must only con­tain let­ters in the Icelandic alpha­bet, and must fit gram­mat­ic­ally with the lan­guage. Other con­sid­er­a­tions include whether it will embar­rass the child in the future and how well aligned it is with Icelandic tra­di­tions. It must have a gen­it­ive end­ing or have been pre­vi­ously adop­ted. Also, names should be gender spe­cific, and no one can have more than three per­sonal names.

Sur­names in Ice­land usu­ally fol­low an inter­est­ing tra­di­tion. They are not fam­ily names, but are rather pat­ronymic, or occa­sion­ally mat­ronymic, with part of a person’s last name includ­ing their father’s name. If a father’s name is Eric, then his son’s sur­name would be Eric­sson (or Eric’s son), and his daughter’s sur­name would be Ericsdóttir (or Eric’s daugh­ter). {note: Accord­ing to one of our Icelandic _flossers, since ‘C’ is not an Icelandic let­ter, the cor­rect spelling is ‘Eiríkur’ and his off­spring would be Eiríksson/Eiríksdóttir, e.g. Lei­fur Eiríksson} Occa­sion­ally, there are true fam­ily names in Ice­land, that are passed down to each gen­er­a­tion. But they are usu­ally in fam­il­ies ori­gin­ally from other coun­tries, or in fam­il­ies where a fam­ily name was adop­ted at one point.

New Zea­l­and

New Zealand’s Births, Deaths, and Mar­riages Regis­tra­tion Act of 1995 doesn’t allow people to name their chil­dren any­thing that “might cause offence to a reas­on­able per­son; or […] is unreas­on­ably long; or without adequate jus­ti­fic­a­tion, […] is, includes, or resembles, an offi­cial title or rank.” Offi­cials at the regis­trar of births have suc­cess­fully talked par­ents out of some more embar­rass­ing names.

The drugs in New Zea­l­and must be par­tic­u­larly strong, because some of the names there are alarm­ing, to say the least.

Rejec­ted names: Stal­lion, Yeah Detroit, Fish and Chips, Twisty Poi, Keenan Got Lucy, Sex Fruit, Satan, and Adolf Hitler

Approved names: Ben­son and Hedges (for a set of twins), Mid­night Chardon­nay, Num­ber 16 Bus Shel­ter, Violence

Another New Zea­l­and spe­cial, Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii (source.). No word on whether it was approved or rejected.

China

Most new babies in China are now basic­ally required to be named based on the abil­ity of com­puter scan­ners to read those names on national iden­ti­fic­a­tion cards. The gov­ern­ment recom­mends giv­ing chil­dren names that are eas­ily read­able, and encour­ages Sim­pli­fied char­ac­ters over Tra­di­tional Chinese ones. Par­ents can tech­nic­ally choose the given name, but num­bers and non-Chinese sym­bols and char­ac­ters are not allowed. Also, now, Chinese char­ac­ters that can not be rep­res­en­ted on the com­puter are not allowed. There are over 70,000 Chinese char­ac­ters, but only about 13,000 can be rep­res­en­ted on the com­puter. Because this require­ment is a new one, some cit­izens are hav­ing their name mis­rep­res­en­ted, and some have to change their names to be accur­ately shown on the iden­ti­fic­a­tion cards.

Nor­way

If you read this post earlier this morn­ing, we said that first names, but not middle names, were gov­erned by Nor­we­gian law. Well, thanks to a Nor­we­gian _flosser Solvi, who was kind enough to send over a Web site (writ­ten in Nor­we­gian, of course), we now know that these laws were changed in 2002. Appar­ently, there used to be an offi­cial gov­ern­ment list of all allowed names. Last names could not be used as first names, and for­eign names that were reli­gious in nature, such as Jesús, or that were insult­ing would not make the cut. Last names also used to adhere to cer­tain rules. If you wanted to change your last name, you would have to show that you were very close to someone else with that last name, such as when you take your spouse’s last name or your mother’s maiden name. Last names that were shared by 500 or fewer people were also pro­tec­ted. It seems that one would have to get the per­mis­sion of all of the people with that last name if one wanted to adopt the name.

Crux of the art­icle sourced from mentalfloss.com

Posted: March 22nd, 2012
Categories: uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

Selective Attention Test

Cre­ated by Daniel Simons and Chris­topher Chab­ris (Link).

Posted: March 5th, 2012
Categories: uncategorized, video
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

Men are men and men should clean the house

Don’t believe me? ;) Google Trans­late.

Posted: January 31st, 2012
Categories: uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

Police FAIL, Suspect WIN

Amer­ican High­way Patrol officers have pulled over a sus­pi­cious driver and are con­duct­ing a search. Can you hear the siren? FAIL in pro­gress...

Did you see it? ;)

Watch again…

Con­sid­er­ing there was no clear cer­ti­fi­able proof of what was on the paper the sus­pect swal­lowed, would he have been allowed to go?

Smart lad!

Posted: January 24th, 2012
Categories: fail, uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

Fascinating Facts

Cour­teousy of 9GAG.

Posted: December 6th, 2011
Categories: uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.

Respect The Rest

It’s 2011. The world moves at a pretty stu­pid rate of knots and we’re all pressed for time.

Are you seem­ingly busier than the lead­ers of the ‘free world’, Chinese sweat­shop work­ers and the col­lect­ive To Do list of the local worker ant population?

I bet you are pres­sured into being invol­un­tar­ily rude to some people so often you actu­ally don’t think twice about it. Correct?

You’re not the only one. Your fam­ily are prob­ably sim­ilar, as are the neigh­bours and that guy on his smart­phone that you share the bus with this morning.

In fact, let’s give you the bene­fit of the doubt and say that you’re prob­ably as busy as I am, which is to say, @#$%ing busy.

Let me ask you something…if you needed to buy an item and walked into my store, up to my counter and asked me if I had it, only to hear that I didn’t, after search­ing for it for a few minutes in the back, would you simply turn your back and walk out or would you express your grat­it­ude for look­ing and then politely and pur­pose­fully leave?

Unless you’re an arrog­ant and com­pletely rude prick I would con­fid­ently bet on the latter.

Why then, when people email me for inform­a­tion & advice, or to quote on work required or even just as an enquiry about an item for sale, can they not be bothered to spent a few seconds giv­ing the polite stranger who’s taken the time out his busy to do pro bono work for you, out of respect and kind­ness, not be exten­ded the same in return?

Some­times your requests are to the det­ri­ment of my own plans and energy. Some­times they involve numer­ous other people. Some­times they neces­sit­ate a lot of work to deal with.

Show me — and the many people like me — some basic F’ing respect.

YOU ARE NOT AS IMPORTANT AS YOU THINK YOU ARE.

YOU ARE JUST LIKE THE REST OF US.

Posted: November 16th, 2011
Categories: uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments.