Spam is a major problem, no doubt.
It’s evident in all spheres of electronic communication — not least of which is the humble blog.
The anti-spam service in use by this blog, depending on traffic at the time, can block hundreds of spam comments per week — and I have yet to fault it, after months of service.
As you can imagine though, it’s an aeons-old battle between those create the crap and those who fight it.
Today though, it’s not quite as easy as it once was to distribute drivel around the ‘net — we have anti-spam software, firewalls, enhanced security and many different types of devices and connections. This causes a problem for the spammers.
The answer, atleast in part, is to get you to go to them.
If you disagree with that notion, think about this for a moment: How many times hjave you visited a marketing ‘site unknowingly? Clicked on ‘badly-positioned’ link which drove an advert to you in some way? Been lured by phishing emails? Thought twice about a questionable email or offer that miiight be true? Participated in a ‘game’, questionaire or competition in order to achieve an end result?
If you said yes to any one of those — and I’m willing to bet you did — you’ve fallen for their ploys.
…and getting you there usually depends on one thing — Google.
Google is a behemoth. You don’t search for something, you Google it.
Google has a system known as PageRank, which in layman’s terms is the reputation of a website. PageRank is responsible for the near annihiliation of old search engine tactics when it comes to getting your ‘site on top.
When you’re looking for something, you’re looking at the first few pages — not page 374, for example.
So, instead of you saying your website is awesome, now your peers need to do it. If John and Bob both make a mean hmaburger, but only Bob’s folks stand by that fact whilst the entire neighbourhood vote in favour of John’s, then you will assume that John is making the better burger out of the two. That’s PageRank for you.
Occasionally I sift through some of the spam comments picked up and blocked here, and I really do have to look twice or even thrice at some of them. They’re very, very clever. Most of the time though, they’re all deleted without a moment’s notice.
This morning, awaiting in my inbox, sat a nonchalant email titled We Love Your Blog!.
First thought? Compliment, actually. In my defense though, it was very early.
Dear Nicholas,
My name is Tara, the assistant editor at We Spam You, http://www.wespamyou.com. We have been blogging about politics, education, and technology for a few months now and we think it is about time to start reaching out to other passionate people.
I would love to have one of our bloggers write a guest post for your blog. If you have any topic or style guidelines for guest posts, please send them my way.
I am looking forward to talking with you more.
Sincerely,
Tara Spicer
Assistant to the Editor — We Spam You
Follow us @WeSpamYou
Well now that doesn’t look so bad now, or does it?
OK, the first thing we’re looking at here is that URL. It just screams automatically-generated. No Human I know in 2011 writes http://. That’s just sloppy coding, I hope — or copying!?
A little bit of Googling quickly revealed an array of Assistant Editors — or is that Assistants to the Editor?
Generic messages too, and especially across a vast scope of ‘sites, not all of which confirm to their stated subjects, just scream spam central.
Their ‘site is accessed via the advertised URL but all links run off of another domain. Ding! Ding! Ding!
Lastly, I came across a few bloggers who had encountered this trap — and fallen for it. Few wrote about the results though. One was nice enough to lay it all out in detailed form. The spammers got their traffic and the blogger got little in return.
Keep your wits about you — whether above, below or on the line, marketers take on an evil tint when they get online.


